A. On July 29, 2004, the plaintiff was born and discharged from office on July 28, 2006 on two occasions on the plaintiff's entry to the entrance and right-hand trees. (1) The plaintiff was born and discharged from office on two occasions.

(2) On May 6, 2005, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as 'the outer unstableness of the letos of the letos of the letos of the letos of the letos of the letos of the letos of the letos of the letos of the letos of the letos of the letos of the letos of the letos of the le tos

(3) On December 20, 2005, the Plaintiff was under the diagnosis of “influence of external instability” due to “the complete performance of the previous fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral” (hereinafter “the second operation”).

B. Around November 2006, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on three occasions, and as a result, (1) the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State during military service to the Defendant on the grounds that he suffered the above wounds in the military service from the Defendant on January 11, 2007, but received the pertinent notification on the requirements for a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the grounds that he suffered the above wounds in the military, but received the first determination below the standards for rating (hereinafter “the first determination”).

(2) On August 7, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the grounds that there was a proximate causal link between the Defendant’s performance of official duties and “scarcity chronic stability (the first operation and the second operation)”, but received the relevant notification on the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State on the grounds that there was a proximate causal link between the Defendant’s performance of official duties and “scarcity chronic stability (the second operation), but on October 1, 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to

(3) On May 30, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) deemed that “on September 5, 2005, around 18:45, the guard duty of the sick and Disease Station was transferred to the direction and control room, the Plaintiff came to the right-hand trees from the stairs due to the movement of the military unit to the command and control room during the movement to the command and control room;” and (b) “the chronic stability of the friendly rupture (hereinafter “instant 1 difference”) and the 'the rupture of the right-hand rupture to the right-hand trees (hereinafter “instant 1 difference”)” was the case 2.