추심금
1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.
2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Summary of the parties' arguments;
A. The gist of the cause of the claim was that the Plaintiff owned the claim for the rent of equipment against the limited company C (hereinafter “C”). However, on January 9, 2018, the Plaintiff received a provisional attachment order (No. 2018Kadan11, Jeonju District Court Decision 2017Gadan53599, Jeonju District Court Decision 2018, Feb. 13, 2018, with respect to the claim for the collection of equipment (hereinafter “the collection claim of this case”) from the Defendant as the claim for the provisional attachment and collection order (No. 29,437,517, which was based on the above final judgment (hereinafter “the collection order of this case”) from the Defendant as the provisional attachment and collection order (the Jeonju District Court 2018Ma1147, hereinafter “the collection order of this case”). < Amended by Act No. 15094, Feb. 14, 2018>
Therefore, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the collection claim and damages for delay of the instant case.
B. The collection order of this case, based on the summary of the defendant's assertion, cannot be seized the amount equivalent to wages to be paid to the workers of the construction (including subcontracted construction) out of the contract amount of the construction work for which the constructor is awarded a contract, under Article 88 of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry and Article 88 of the Enforcement Decree of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry
(2) The scope of the amount equivalent to wages under paragraph (1) and the calculation method shall be prescribed by Presidential Decree.
(1) The amount equivalent to the wage as prescribed in Article 88 (2) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act shall be calculated by summing up the wages specified in the calculation sheet from among contract amount of the construction work in question.
(2) The ordering person (including the contractor in cases of a subcontract) of a construction work shall specify the wage as referred to in paragraph (1) in a contract or subcontract document.
shall not be subject to seizure under the provisions of this subsection.