"200 Highest 1866"

1. Crimes related to Samsung Criger 4000 and 84500 Lene;

A. On March 22, 2019, the Defendant applied for a siren against “name AY, birth date AY, cellphone No. AX,” and “ Address AZ Building BAA subparagraph 1” to the employees in charge, using AW’s cell phone (AX) in the vicinity of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government AV market, and then called “name AW,” “AY,” “AY,” “portable phone number AX,” and “ Address AZA subparagraph 2 of the BA in the event of his/her address in Gyeonggi-gu,” and the Defendant applied for a siren against “Y, 400, total rental amount of KRW 450, total rental amount of KRW 4,734,00, monthly rental amount of KRW 78,90, and 60 months during the siren period of 60 months.”

Accordingly, the above employee entered the above AW’s personal information into the agreement and demanded the Defendant to sign on the mobile phone screen. The Defendant signed “AW” in the contractor column, etc. and entered the above AW’s “Agreement” in the name of AW, which is a prior recording of the rights and obligations, for the purpose of hindering the Defendant’s management of business affairs. As above, the said employee entered the written contract file into the said N, and sent it to the said N.

As a result, the Defendant forged another person's prior records on rights and obligations, and exercised another person's prior records.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, applied for a siren to the effect that, at the same time and place as in the victim N Co., Ltd., a total of KRW 4,734,00, a total of KRW 78,90 per month, the Defendant borrowed Samsung Refriger and KRW 40 to a total of KRW 4,734,00.

However, in fact, the Defendant maintained his livelihood on a daily basis and did not have any import since there was no daily distance at the time, and entered into the above contract from the beginning with the intention of disposing of it to a third party without the intention to use the said cooling, and even if the Defendant was given a siren from the victim company, he did not have the intent or ability to pay sirens.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim company to this effect and belongs to the victim company.