When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. On January 27, 2012, the Defendant entered the mobile phone entrance application form “B” in the customer column of Chapter B to open the mobile phone in the name of the Defendant’s model B, and then issued B’s signature on the next side to the Defendant, respectively, to an employee in the name of the non-known fact-finding as if it was duly formed.

B. On January 30, 2012, the Defendant entered the application form for mobile phone entry into “B” in the customer column of Chapter 1 in order to open a mobile phone in the name of the said B, and then issued B’s signature to the said employee without knowing the fact as if it were duly formed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising rights and duties, the Defendant forged three copies of the mobile phone application form in the victim B's mobile phone name, and exercised forged documents, respectively.

2. Fraud;

A. The defendant's person

1. A. The date, time, and location of the mobile phone as mentioned above, by deceiving the victim SK Telecom staff as if they would normally pay the terminal price, charges, etc. even though they did not have the intent or ability to pay the said fees, etc. even if they opened the mobile phone, and its equipment received two mobile phones (D, E) from the victim SK Telecom staff through opening to September 2012, and did not pay a total of KRW 1,979,850, including the mobile phone price, charges, etc. from around September 2012.

B. The defendant-appellant

1. B. The date, time, and location of a mobile phone as mentioned above, deceiving the employee in charge of the victim KT to pay the terminal price, charges, etc. normally even though they opened the mobile phone, as if they did not have the intent or ability to pay the charges, etc., and they belong thereto.