except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 14:40 on May 21, 201, in front of the E building managed by the victim C in Gwangju-do, Gwangju-do; (b) went through the wall inside the wall surrounding the said building through the entrance of the lower parking lot, with the intent to steal the inside of the said building or things in front of the said building; and (c) coloring the stolen object, such as opening the underground factory windows and the rubber lids owned by the victim; (d) but (e) did not discover any things that can be stolen; and (e) did not result in attempted crimes.

2. The Defendant: (a) was a thief of the victim F’s residence intrusion and attempted theft at the same time and place under the above paragraph (1); (b) went beyond the fence surrounding the building of the above paragraph (1) in order to steals goods from the next house; (c) went into the marina of the victim F in the next side; and (d) Gyeonggi-do in which the victim G is living; and (c) sought water to find whether there was a stolen article on the mace and the second floor of the house; (d) however, the Defendant did not commit an attempted crime because he was frighten in the front of the second floor visit, and was frighten and frighted, and did not go into the middle floor by drinking and

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of C, I and F;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (No. 1 of the evidence list);

1. Relevant Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment, and Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (infusing a structure and entering into a residence), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed on a defendant with the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, who has the ability to impose four penalties on him/her for the same crime and repeats the crimes on several occasions;

However, the execution shall be suspended in consideration of the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized, the defendant did not have any criminal history exceeding the fine prior to the crime of this case, and each theft crime is committed against the attempted crime.