손실보상금
1. The defendant is against the plaintiff A, 47,589,450 won, 30,433,730 won, and the plaintiff Pyeongtaek Pyeong-si Sception.
Details of the disposition
(a) The type of the project, its implementer, and its announcement 1): Housing redevelopment project (C Housing Redevelopment Project) (hereinafter “instant project”);
(2) Project implementer: Public notice of project implementation authorization for Defendant 3: D public notice of the Busan Metropolitan City Northern District on October 7, 2009, and E public notice on November 3, 2010
B. Of the adjudication of expropriation by the Regional Land Tribunal of Busan Metropolitan City on August 20, 2012 (hereinafter “adjudication of expropriation”), the part related to the plaintiffs’ claim in this case 1) subject to expropriation (hereinafter collectively “each of the instant land and obstacles” is referred to as “each of the instant land and obstacles.
(A) Plaintiff A: Plaintiff B: 144m2 in Busan Northern-gu, Busan-do, 144m2 in size, H 5m2 in size, 2/3 of the Imb 24m2 in size, 1/2 of the Jdo 72m2 in size, and 479m2 in size, L previous 493m2 in size, 17m2 in size, 60m2 in size, and 2m2 in size as well as 3m2 in size: The date of expropriation on October 15, 2012 (hereinafter “Objection”) by the Central Land Tribunal on June 20, 2013
The plaintiffs' compensation for partial expropriation related to the plaintiffs' claims in this case: the plaintiff A's total amount of KRW 1,919,55,760, the plaintiff B's total of KRW 719,837,450, the plaintiff's clan total of KRW 1,025,81,380 [which is the ground for recognition]; Gap's evidence 1 through 6, and 11 (each number is included in the number; the plaintiff's assertion and judgment of the purport of the whole pleadings;
A. Since the appraisal by the plaintiffs' assertion of this case and the appraisal by the ruling of acceptance and objection are unlawful in not reflecting the market price in calculating compensation for each land and obstacles of this case, the compensation for the plaintiffs should be increased as stated in the purport of claim.
(Plaintiff A claims KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).
Judgment
1. Each land of this case and obstacles thereto.