특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
The punishment of the accused shall be determined by a year of imprisonment.
The application for compensation order of this case shall be dismissed.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a holder of Crain Vehicle and a person engaged in driving of the Crain Vehicle.
1. On October 23, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) driven the said vehicle on the 13:58 side of October 23, 2018, and driven the D front road into a shooting distance protection area of the telephone station in the vicinity of the Seocheonbuk Island; (b) the Defendant was confirmed as a person who violated the Road Traffic Act by the patrol vehicle No. 11 of the G District-gu 11 where the Gyeong F is working, and was under the direction of stopping, and led to escape, under the direction of stopping.
No driver of any motor vehicle, etc. shall threaten or endanger any other person, or cause any danger to traffic, by continuously or repeatedly committing any act, such as a violation of signal or direction, violation of speed, violation of prohibition of crossing or moving backward, violation of safety distance, violation of prohibition of changing course, violation of prohibition of rapid driving, etc.
Nevertheless, the Defendant continued to commit an act of invasion on the central line, a signal violation, a backtake, a violation of the prohibition of future progress, and a violation of the prohibition of change of course, from the above place to the new interest interest household in 92-1, Seocheon-ro, Bucheon-ro, thereby threatening or endangering others, or causing danger to traffic.
2. A violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unclaimed Measures after Accidents) are proceeding with the Defendant driving of a radar car as set forth in paragraph (1) while avoiding the control of a police officer, the Defendant is proceeding by straighting the front road of H from the long-distance flood protection on the long-term distance of at least 14:00 on the same day to the
The latter became more serious.
In such cases, when it is likely to obstruct the normal traffic of pedestrians, other motor vehicles and horses, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to cross the road by driving the motor vehicle and horses.
Nevertheless, the Defendant violated this.