However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 26, 2014, around 15:00, the Defendant sold clothing, etc. at front of the Busan Bank DD branch in Busan Jung-gu, and registered with the Korean Intellectual Property Office 15:00 on June 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) the owner of the trademark “Yent” company; (b) Germany’s Dazers; (c) the owner of the trademark “Madice Madern; (d) Japan’s Madice Madern; (d) France’s Madern; (d) It’s Madern 1; (d) It’s Mar. 1, 207; (d) the registration number No. 30, 30, 472708; (e) the trademark registration number No. 250, 30, 50, 30, 30, 47, 50, 30, 840, 37, 48.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the seizure records and the list of seizure, each attachment of the trademark register, market price computation report;

1. Article 93 of the Trademark Act as to facts constituting an offense (limited to each registered trademark);

1. Articles 40 and 50 (Mutual Violation of the Trademark Act) of the Commercial Competition Act;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the same Act, although the nature of the crime is not weak in light of the scale of the crime, motive of the crime, the confession of the crime, the violation in consideration of the health of the defendant, etc.);

1. Article 97-2 (1) of the Trademark Act that is confiscated;