beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.06.15 2016고단711

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months and a fine not exceeding 600,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act on March 5, 2016, at around 02:50 on the same day at the B District District of Kimhae-gu Police Station B District on the same day, and found a complaint about the fact that drinking was controlled at around 01:00 on the same day, and died of the Defendant at a large interest rate. The Defendant was at the time of 20 years, i.e., bit of bit of bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a

Me at the time of 100 years, she considered that she was grow C, and that she would have a bitch of bitch of a bitch of the president, she would want to look at a detention room, and she would have she could sprink, and she could she let the B B entrance, she was cut off with a her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

2. On March 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the police station B district located in Kimhae-gu, Kim Jong-gu, a police station B of the Gyeong-gu, the Defendant: (b) stated that “I am a large interest interest rate even after the Defendant was arrested in the act of committing an act of committing an offense, such as the foregoing paragraph 1, the Defendant had the wooden Panel walked that “I am a Chewing dog, a swimming son, a swimming son, a ambom, a son, a swine son, a swine son, a swine son, a swine son, a swine son, a swine son, etc., walked twice as a b district-based civil petition.”

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the articles used by public offices to pay repair costs.

3. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 위 2 항과 같은 일시, 장소에서 민원 데스크를 발로 차 던 중 이를 제지하는 위 지구대 순경 D로부터 관공서 주 취소란 및 공용 물건 손상으로 현행범 체포를 당할 수 있다는 말을 듣고 이에 화가 나 위 D에게 “야 이 씹할 놈 아. ”라고 욕설을 하며 위 D의 왼쪽 허벅지를 1회 세게 걷어 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate performance of official duties on the security of government offices and the protection of facilities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The application of the law of internal investigation report (for example, by attaching one video CD on the criminal suspect) 1.

참조조문