If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. The Defendant interfered with his duties on the ground that the victim D, who was in Seogpo City C on April 15, 2013, did not receive an employee from the “E” entertainment tavern, “E, bitch bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, and flat, flat, flat, flat, and flat, flat, flat, flat, flat, and flat, flat at the time of the said victim.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the work as an employee of the victim's entertainment tavern.

2. On 01:10 on the same day as Paragraph 1, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by the police officer with legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling of the On-the-spot movement case, such as assaulting twice the F’s timber on the 2nd hand by examining the defective damaged floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime; Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;