beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.10.25 2013노572

사기

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant of mistake of facts did not receive 6 million won each at the expense of the victims, and explained that the use of the shopping mall program (H) developed by the Defendant would lead the victims to increase sales and generate profits. The victims accepted this and purchased each of 6 million won and each of 6 million won of the program.

The program was produced by requesting F to the developer who created the plan around July 2008 by the customer to make the plan, and the idea cannot be converted into money, because the customer could personally manage the customer's phone to the company.

The defendant was paid 6 million won to the victims each of the above programs.

Around December 2009, the program operation had already been produced, and the defendant received six million won each from the victims, and ordered F to do three-dimensional hostings individually to allow the victims to use the program. In other words, the defendant ordered F to use the second domain name individually on the I homepage.

6 million won is the sum of the above hosting costs of 150,000 won and the expenses of the defendant who has developed the operation of the above program.

The defendant explained this fact to the victims, received six million won from the victims, and granted the victims the right to use the program in advance through F, so the victims can look at the contact address, status, and access time of each of their own shopping mall visitors on the I website. The shopping mall sales and shopping mall sales became possible.

Accordingly, the defendant was a seller of the above program, and I.D. to the victims.