beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.12.13 2018고단2389

업무상횡령등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 2389]

1. The Defendant has been engaged in the work of occupational embezzlement from October 9, 2016 to June 23, 2018 in the work of having been engaged in the work of having been engaged in the work of having been engaged in the work of having been engaged in the work of management of the above telecom and receiving accommodation expenses, etc. from customers in the DNA telecom operated by the victim C at the window B of creative city from around October 9, 2018.

When the above Mour guests make a settlement of accommodation expenses by e-mail card or credit card, etc., the defendant was in possession of a usual room if the customers pay accommodation expenses in cash with the knowledge that only the number of damages on the following day is confirmed.

After making a sales slips by settling accounts with E's physical cards, etc., the defendant had a mind to arbitrarily use accommodation expenses for the victim's custody by cancelling the settlement.

On April 2, 2017, the Defendant was in possession of KRW 90,000,00,000 from his/her name-free customers in cash, at around 01:01, the Defendant was in possession of the Defendant.

The E’s cash 90,000 won, which was under his/her business custody, was arbitrarily consumed for personal purposes at the Changwon-si around that time, and then embezzled the victim’s property by arbitrarily consuming the total amount of 5,235,000 won of cash, which was under his/her business custody for the victim for 54 occasions, such as the last day of the attached crime list (1).

2. Fraud;

A. On April 14, 2017, around 15:26, at the same place as Paragraph 1, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “If a person borrows money, he/she shall make an investment in a person who operates a singinging business with the money without paying interest to the victim and shall pay the principal after three months.”

However, the defendant's personal use, such as debt repayment and illegal private Internet sports earth and entertainment funds, without the intention to invest in the lapsing business.