(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Grounds for recognition: Confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. The Plaintiff filed a claim against Defendant C, in collusion with Defendant B, sold 30 gluss (hereinafter “instant trees”) of pine trees on the ground located D at the time when the Plaintiff purchased from Defendant B in collusion with Defendant B, and Defendant C is jointly and severally liable with Defendant B to pay the Plaintiff damages amounting to KRW 40 million and damages for delay.

However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that Defendant C conspired with Defendant B to sell the instant trees twice to E, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant C is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is justified, and the claim against the defendant C is dismissed as it is without merit.