beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.06.18 2015고단1455

건설산업기본법위반

Text

Defendant

A and B KRW 14,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

The F Co., Ltd. F (hereinafter referred to as the “F”), Defendant G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “G”) is a person who runs each construction business and falls under the category of business as prescribed by Article 2(1) of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act.

Defendant

A as a managing director of the above F's Environmental Plant Headquarters's Plant Business Team, is an entity in charge of the affairs related to the orders, business, and bidding of the above company.

Defendant

B as the head of the environmental project headquarters of the above G, a person in charge of the field construction supervision, budget execution, internship business, safety management, etc. related to the environmental project of the above G.

Defendant

C as a managing director in charge of the environmental project headquarters of the above G, a person who is in charge of all the business activities related to receiving orders related to environmental project, such as collecting information, technical business, and preparation of tender documents, and on July 5, 2013, the Gwangju District Court sentenced him/her to imprisonment with labor for the offering of bribe at the same time as the offering of bribe, and the judgment was finalized on July 8, 2013.

Defendant

D as the head of the environmental project headquarters of the above G, the person who is in charge of the collection of bid information, analysis of industry trends, discovery of new projects, and overall business affairs related to construction contracts as the head of the environmental project headquarters of the above G, and on October 29, 2012, the judgment was finalized on July 13, 2013.

Defendant

E is the head of the above F's Environmental Plant Headquarters's Plant Business Team, who is in charge of all activities related to ordering information collection, technical business, and construction contracts.

1. Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E

O. During the bid process of “R” publicly announced by the former PPP as bid price of KRW 64,340,000,000 for the estimated construction cost. Defendant B, through Defendant C and Defendant D, set the bid price in advance to prevent the decline in the successful bid price due to the low-price competition between Defendant E and Defendant D on March 3, 2010.