However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 22:25 on 2017. 27. 27. 206. 22:25, the Defendant: (a) expressed a bath to the Defendant, “D” in front of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and received 112 reports related to business interference; (b) the Defendant was requested to return home from the slopeF belonging to the Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Police Station Earn, “Wing the rank head, fing fing, smoking fring, and gringing”; and (c) received a f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s fat at one time by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Investigation report (investigation, etc. of motion pictures taken by police officers on the spot), a lot: Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to motion pictures taken by a field police officer;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing as set forth below) is [the scope of recommendations] and the basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person subject to special sentencing) of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Public Duties (the grounds for sentencing), there is no person subject to a suspended sentence (the decision subject to a suspended sentence] [the decision subject to a suspended sentence] [the person subject to a suspended sentence] and the person subject to a suspended sentence of one year needs to be strict for establishing legal order and

However, the defendant's mistake is recognized.

It is a contingent crime.

There are many criminal offenses against the defendant, but the last is 2003.

The sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the conditions of sentencing, such as the defendant's age, sex, family relationship, and property status, and the execution thereof shall be suspended only once.