2. The crime of this case is deemed to have committed the crime of this case by forging and using an inspection report on the temperature prevention device to be supplied to a nuclear power plant, and the above parts are parts that significantly affect the safety of nuclear power generation, and the defendant committed the above crime over 34 times for about 4 years in light of the fact that the defendant committed the above crime.

However, in full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant appears to have led to the instant crime and reflect his mistake; (b) the quality of the temperature center supplied by the Defendant appears to have no special defect; (c) the benefits acquired by the Defendant appear to have never been significant due to the instant crime; (d) the Defendant’s primary offender who has no record of criminal punishment; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and method of the instant crime; and (e) other factors that may serve as conditions for sentencing, such as the circumstances after the instant crime.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.