When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

In around 2005, the Defendant failed to pass the public bonds examination as a police officer, and around 2009, the case investigated for violation of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc. was dealt with differently from the statement of the police officer in charge, and was dissatisfied with the usual police. While being under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was able to walk around the Jungran Police Station, and the above complaints were able to look at the police station.

On May 3, 2013, at around 23:20, the Defendant, a dangerous object in the street (20 cm, 15 cm, 8 cm, cm, cm, cm) near the Jung-gu Seoul Central Police Station, was carried with it, and passed through the front door of the said police station, and damaged the goods used by public offices to remove the repair cost of approximately KRW 250,000,00 by gathering the front door door of the central entrance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure, and application of the photograph thereof by statutes;

1. Article 144 (1) and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act and Articles 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act include: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000,00,000; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime by contingency while under the influence of alcohol; (c) the Defendant was faced with hospitalized treatment due to alcohol abuse and mental disorders; and (d) the Defendant appears to be suffering from the above illness; and (c) the Defendant is expected to receive additional mental treatment for the Defendant; (d) the Defendant still is expected to return to society normally after treatment; (e) the degree of damage is limited to KRW 2.50,00,000; and (e) the damage recovery was made by the damage side; and (e) the Defendant is against depth.