2. In light of the following: (a) there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the original judgment as the new sentencing materials have not been submitted in the trial at the lower court; and (b) other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (c) the sentencing of the lower court exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion because the sentencing of the lower court is too remote.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.