2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is a school foundation that operates C University. The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) is a teacher who was appointed on March 5, 192 as the above university D and a full-time lecturer, and was appointed through the assistant professor and the associate professor on April 1, 2007.

B. On March 28, 2014, the Plaintiff demanded a resolution on disciplinary action against the Intervenor on the grounds of the following disciplinary reasons (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”). On June 30, 2014, following the resolution of the Cuniversity Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee, the Plaintiff issued two months of suspension from office against the Intervenor.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disciplinary action”). - From March 5, 1992 to the date of the application for participation in the App Center’s TT Programs from 2011 to 2013, the intervenor submitted a letter of merit sent to the school in the course of the application for participation in the App Center’s TT Programs, and the official document submitted to the school by the intervenor was partially modified. The modified official document was that the cost of participation in training was increased compared to the actual official document of the App Center, and the increased amount is the amount where one person uses the one person room at the time of training. On the other hand, in the event of participation in external training, the school subsidized the cost of participation in the standard of two persons, and the additional cost is paid by the participant in the training.

b. A school has subsidized the cost of participation in training in the modified document submitted by the Intervenor, and accordingly, the additional amount of KRW 100,000 per time (total five times, total 50,000) compared to the subsidization of the cost of participation in the standard for the two persons' office (total five times, total 50,000) was unduly disbursed. - As such, the Intervenor required the school to pay the increased cost of participation that has been submitted to the school to the altered document, which is not maintaining its dignity as a teacher, and is defective to “two months for suspension” in accordance with the standards for the disciplinary decision of the school juristic person A’s

On July 30, 2014, an intervenor revoked the instant disciplinary action against the Defendant.