However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the Defendants are the defendants.

1. At around 01:30 on January 21, 2019, Defendant A committed assault, such as: (a) around the drinking house located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul; and (b) “I wish to commit assault; (c)” committed assault by Defendant A, stating that “I am out of the drinking house” to E on the ground that E took away from the drinking house to verify the details of the report by the police station affiliated with the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Police Station D police station, which received the 112 report and called “I am out of the drinking house; (d) I am fling off the drinking house; (e) he embling E with the Defendant; (e) ambling E’s breast part by hand; and (e) kbling E’s spath, kbling E’s head, and receiving the parts of E’s head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of 112 reported police officers.

2. Defendant B: (a) arrested the victim F, who was a police officer, as a flagrant offender, and arrested the victim F, as a flagrant offender A, and she set up one of the patrol keys equivalent to KRW 77,000 at the market price of KRW 157,936 at the bottom of the market price; and (b) took advantage of any gaps in which he did not pay any attention, the Defendant 2 carried one of the key and one of the portable bar printers at the bottom.

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the property managed by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Each investigation report (the attachment of photographs of motion pictures, CCTV images, etc./(b) of damaged objects);

1. 112 Reporting case handling table; and

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CDs for producing CCTV images and mobile phones;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Defendant B who choose to imprisonment: Article 329 of the Criminal Act; Selection of imprisonment;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants on probation and order to attend the course: Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act; and

1. Scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

A. Defendant A’s obstruction of performance of official duties (influence of performance of official duties and coercion of duties).