출입국관리법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (in fact-finding or misunderstanding of legal principles) of the Defendant’s husband had already named the name “E” from “C” to “C” at the time of invitation. Thus, the Defendant’s application for a visa issuance certificate with the content of inviting the husband’s name “C” is dismissed as there is no likelihood of expectation for other lawful acts.
2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the trial court, in particular, the notice of decision on examining an immigration offender, E’s written statement, etc., the Defendant and the male living together from around 2005 controlled illegal aliens and forced departure from Korea on March 17, 2009, the name and date of birth through I who is the seat of the country to re-entry into Korea shall be deemed to be C, D, and the Defendant and the Defendant reported marriage on May 25, 2009. On June 23, 2009, the Defendant invited “C is a husband who completed the marriage report,” and C was lawfully released from the Defendant’s husband’s “the same period of time as the Defendant’s husband,” and the Defendant’s husband’s request for re-entry to “E” under the premise that the Defendant’s husband was prohibited from entering the Republic of Korea as well as the Defendant’s husband’s “the above period of time,” and thus, the Defendant’s request for re-entry from the Defendant’s name and the Defendant’s husband.