2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant all recognized the instant crime; (b) the special larceny crime was committed against the Defendant; (c) agreed with the victim E; and (d) the victim H expressed his intention not to punish the Defendant; and (c) the damage was returned.

However, the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case again without the awareness of any particular crime, as mentioned by the court below, even though he was subject to criminal punishment several times for the same crime, and as mentioned in the court below, the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case again without the awareness of any particular crime. The nature of the crime is heavy, the sentence of the Defendant’s sentence is inevitable, there is no particular change in circumstances to take into account the sentencing in the trial, and in light of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the background and consequence of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.