2. The Defendant’s disadvantage is that the illegality of the instant crime, which was committed by the police officer who weared the judgment uniform, is not weak, and that it was not agreed with the victimized police officer, etc.

On the other hand, the fact that the crime of this case occurred by contingency, that the defendant repents and reflects his fault late, and that the defendant does not have been punished as the same crime is favorable to the defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances, considering various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and means of crime, the judgment of the court below is deemed appropriate within the reasonable scope of discretion.

Therefore, we cannot accept the prosecutor's unfair argument of sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.