2. The judgment of the court has taken into account the following circumstances: The defendant's mistake is divided, the economic situation of the defendant is difficult, the support of two minor children is supported by the defendant's large father, her husband, or her mother's wife wanting to take the front position of the defendant. However, the crime of this case is committed by deceiving the victim for about 2 years and 6 months in total by deceiving the defendant, and by deceiving the victim, which is a document with significant social credibility in the course of deceiving the victim, and it is extremely poor in quality of the crime in light of the law of crime, the amount of damage, and the frequency and period of the crime. The victim's lending money to the defendant, which causes serious damage to the victim, such as heavy damage caused to the victim, and the victim's most of the damage amount has not been repaid, and the victim's children have not been punished more than 2 years in the first instance court, and the defendant has been punished more than 5 years in the form of imprisonment with prison labor and the circumstances of the defendant's new sentencing guidelines for the crime of this case.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.