However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 21:00 on October 20, 201, the Defendant discovered that the Victim D (year 45) and the Victim E (year 50) are drinking alcohol, and found the Victim E (age 50), “I would like to have a complaint against the payment of the drinking value at a time,” and went out of the victim with the victim, and went out of the victim when I would like to take back the face of the victim E at a time. After drinking, I would like to walk the body of drinking and her face from drinking, walking from drinking and her face at several times, the victim D mets the face of the victim, and walking from drinking in several times, she would have the victim’s body walked, she would have the victim E suffer an injury to the victim, and she would have the victim suffer an injury to the victim’s left side of the treatment days, and she would have the victim interfere with the victim’s left side of the victim’s injury requiring treatment during the day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the E, F, and G;

1. Application of the legislation in its opinion;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [ mitigated factors] The main reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act is as follows: (a) serious injury [the scope of recommending punishment] among the general injury resulting from violent crime groups; (b) the basic area of punishment; (c) April - one year and six months (the decision of sentence]; (d) the defendant was not guilty; (e) agreed with the victims;