except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 20, 2012, the Defendant concluded a contract to provide services for feasibility study and profitability assessment related to the construction of the E-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with respect to F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 157, 153 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of confessions;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment] Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the grounds for sentencing [the scope of recommending punishment] Article 62(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (a special mitigation person] confession [the decision of sentencing] Defendant accused F as a crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (a special mitigation person]. This was at risk of being sentenced to imprisonment for a limited term of not less than three