A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

1. Defendant A

A. Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts, including brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic (such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic), the Defendant is a person who operated sexual traffic establishments on the Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon and the third floor of the building from August 25, 2016 to March 10, 2017, with the trade name of “E”.

The defendant employed 2 to 3 women at the above business establishment, and received 70,000 won from the indivators, and made the above women to engage in a similar teaching act using his hand after making the boom against the customers in the room prepared within the business establishment, and acquired 35,000 won, which is a part of the price of sexual traffic received from the customers.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

B. On July 15, 2016, the Defendant was in the office of 1002 of the Seo-gu Daejeon Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, where he had been aware of it.

B "After entering into a lease contract in four names in preparation for the control of police, the business operator shall be registered, and if the control is conducted, the four business places shall be operated.

As a result of the investigation, B requested to the effect that it would pay KRW 1,500,00 per month in return for that investigation, and that it would pay all fines due to the crackdown. Upon the request, B entered into a building lease agreement under its own name on July 22, 2016, and registered as its own business operator on August 10, 2016, and on September 6, 2016, upon the police’s control, B made a false statement to the effect that the person operating a commercial sex business establishment was himself/herself upon being investigated at the office of the life safety and living order division of the Daejeon Local Police Agency on September 21, 2016 and on September 28, 2016. On March 10, 2017, B made a false statement to the effect that he/she was the person who was engaged in commercial sex business at the police’s second control and was subject to a false investigation by the person who was engaged in commercial sex business.

As such, the Defendant instigated B to escape a person who committed a crime subject to a fine or heavier punishment.

2. Defendant B A.