2. There are extenuating circumstances that can be considered favorably, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects the fact that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder caused by alcohol acute addiction.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant, who intrudes into the underground shopping district by using the open cresh of the entrance door door stack, and thus stolen cash, and thus, the nature of the crime is not good in light of the method and form of the crime. The defendant committed the crime of this case habitually, including seven times of the past power, even though the defendant committed the crime of this case was ten times or more, and is a repeated crime due to the same crime, and the damage was not completely recovered, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., the defendant's allegation of unfair sentencing is not accepted, since the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit.