Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous.

2. The lower court also asserted the same purport as the above grounds for appeal.

As to this, the court below rejected the defendant's above assertion by taking account of the evidence presented in its judgment and finding the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case.

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the victim’s statement from the investigative agency is consistent with the victim’s statement: “The defendant posted a notice that criticizes the victim on the elevator bulletin board of each of the elevator of this case; the victim’s person who attempted to remove the notice attached to the above apartment 103 elevator from the rear side of the defendant’s defect; and the victim’s breast part is blue with the victim’s snow with the victim’s eye blue with the victim’s eye after the victim’s eye fluort with the victim’s eye fluort with the victim’s eye.” (3 books No. 129 of the trial record, evidence No. 10, 22 of the trial record); ② The victim’s statement on the victim’s motive and motive was consistent with the victim’s right to use the above apartment 103 elevator and the victim’s photograph during the process of the victim’s act.”