beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2016.04.20 2016고정8

양곡관리법위반

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of B agricultural partnership, a company of grain, and the defendant B is the agricultural partnership that has its principal office in North-gu, North-gu.

1. 피고인 A 피고인은 2015. 7. 22. 경부터 2015. 11. 5. 경까지 위 영농조합법인의 미곡 처리장에서 포항, 경주, 울산, 부산 등에 있는 거래처에 판매하였다가 총 28회에 걸쳐 반품 받은 쌀 6,972kg 중 5,972kg 을 재포장하여 판매하면서 가공 일자를 반품 전 가공 일자가 아니라 재포장한 날짜로 기재하여 판매하는 한편 그 과정에서 2015. 10. 20. 경부터 2015. 11. 5. 경까지 는 2014년에 생산되어 출하되었다가 반품된 쌀 1,730kg 중 1,570kg 을 2015년 햅쌀과 섞어서 판매하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as a grain processor, made a false indication on the quality, etc. of grain, and sold rice mixed with different years of production.

2. Defendant B, a representative of the Defendant’s agricultural partnership, committed an act in violation of the law as described in paragraph (1) above with respect to his business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. Evidence and photographs of a violation of the grain labelling;

1. Copy of business registration certificate and details of return by trade company;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Submission of the sales ledger report and the preparation of a certificate of date of reprocessing returned rice), investigation reports (a certificate of all registered matters shall be attached);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Article 32 subparag. 3 of the Grain Management Act, Article 20-3 subparag. 1 of the same Act (including false labeling, including false labeling), Article 32 subparag. 4 of the Grain Management Act, and Article 20-4 subparag. 2 of the same Act (including the fact of mixed sale of different rice whose production year is different, including the fact of mixed sale of different rice), and each fine;

B. Defendant B farming association corporation: Articles 35, 32 subparag. 3, and 20-3 subparag. 1 (including false labeling, including false labeling) of the Grain Management Act; Articles 35, 32 subparag. 4, and 20-4 of the Grain Management Act.