However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

1. On February 4, 2016, the Defendant forged public document: (a) around 18:00, for the purpose of showing to the family members of women-friendly-dong, women-friendly-dong, who were congested at the PC room located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, Gwangju, a business registration certificate form through the Internet, and entered “C”, “A”, etc. in the business registration certificate column by using the computer, as if the Defendant had operated C, and then written the business registration certificate as if the Defendant had operated C, and then printed it in the publisher’s column with the seal affixed by the head of Seo-gu Tax Office.

For this purpose, the Defendant forged a copy of the business registration certificate under the name of the head of Seo-gu District Tax Office.

2. On February 4, 2016, the Defendant exercised the forged official document display of the forged official document registration certificate as if it were issued genuinely to the same students of B, who knew of the forged fact, at night, in the Saam reservoir Park in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of a copy of forged business registration certificate to statutes;

1. Articles 225, 229, and 225 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act; Article 62 (1) of the same Act; Article 62 (1));