도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On May 7, 2015, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 4 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch of the Daegu District Court.
1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act;
A. At around 02:30 on September 17, 2019, the Defendant driven a Fran vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 300 meters alcohol concentration of 0.049% in the section of approximately 300 meters from the front of the road in Gumi-si B to the front of the road in the same city D.
B. On October 15, 2019, at around 08:45, the Defendant driven a Fchier car under the influence of alcohol with approximately 5km alcohol concentration of about 0.073% from the section of about 5km in the same city from the front day of the Matern Domcheon-si to the H front day in the same city G.
Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.
2. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Fchip motor vehicle.
On October 15, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.073% in blood alcohol level around 08:45 on October 15, 2019, and continued two-lanes in front of the H road located in G in Gyeong-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Seoul.
In such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to care in advance to prevent accidents by accurately operating and safely operating the steering and steering gear.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting the influence of alcohol, was driven by the victim I (the age of 26) who was driven by the victim I (the age of 26) in the same room from the front bank of the Defendant due to the negligence of the Defendant’s negligence, and was driven by the Defendant as the front part of the franchise vehicle operated by the Defendant.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks due to such occupational negligence.
Summary of Evidence
1..