공무집행방해등
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.
Punishment of the crime
1. On September 11, 2015, around 23:55, the Defendants were required to make a statement on the current situation from H and I in the process of investigating the details of the report by H and I on the part of the G District in the Seoul Songpa Police Station G District, which was dispatched to the site after receiving the 112 report.
Accordingly, Defendant B and I erred in what she is, and the police officer called she was called, she was called her, she was called her, and she was her entrance into the entrance by cutting off the entrance to the entrance by cutting off the entrance, and Defendant B prevented her from entering the entrance. Defendant A used the left side of the police steering her for cutting off the chest and the her arms, leading about 5 meters by cutting off the arms of H. Defendant B. Defendant B assaulted Defendant B by cutting off the arms of H.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported duties by the police.
2. The Defendants interfering with their business due to the payment of the victim D, the victim E and the alcohol value at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.
12 Report calls out by police officers, and Defendant A expressed her motive to the victim E as “gy, Chewing, and two-years,” and Defendant B expressed her motive to the victim E as “the victim E,” and the victim E expressed her motive to “the same year, chewing,” and caused the victim to go out of the place.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the restaurant business of victims by force.
3. The Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint property damage, etc.) broken the victim D’s satis, as the victim D was sent to the above satis house during the time and place set forth in paragraph (1). The satis and the victim’s satis, who was in front of the above satis house, did not know about the market price of the victim’s possession, and satis, etc.
Accordingly, the Defendants are the defendants.