However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 17:00 on December 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was unable to ask himself the new stock complex located in B apartment at the residence of the Defendant in the East Sea (the age of 49). On the ground that the Defendant was unable to ask himself/herself the new stock complex located in his/her house; (b) the Defendant, as a drinking, sustained the victim’s face and head head at several times; and (c) the Defendant continued to drive the victim behind his/her house, led him/her into his/her house, led him/her into his/her face and head, and led him/her into his/her house, and led him/her to his/her hair face and head, thereby causing injury to the victim at least three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the absence of a criminal punishment heavier than a fine and the fact that the victim does not want to be punished);

1. Probation and lecture attendance order shall be decided as per the Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act or more;