2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

가. 원고들의 주장 1) 원고 A는 사위인 원고 B을 대리인으로 하여(예비적으로 원고 B이 직접 당사자로서) 2013. 2. 1. 피고 C와 원주시 F 전 1,749㎡ 중 별지도면 표시 1, 2, 12, 13, 14, 1의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㈁부분 34㎡, G 전 883㎡ 중 같은 도면 표시 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 2의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㈃부분 291㎡, 같은 H 전 3,253㎡ 중 같은 도면 표시 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 5의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㈅부분 99㎡(이하 위 F, G, H 토지들을 통틀어 ‘이 사건 토지’라고 하고, 이 사건 토지 중 위 ㈁, ㈃, ㈅부분을 통틀어 ‘이 사건 통행로’라고 한다

3) As to the instant lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

A) The Plaintiff (Preliminary Plaintiff B) paid KRW 20 million to Defendant C in accordance with the instant lease agreement. As such, Defendant C is obligated to implement procedures for the registration of the right to lease regarding the instant passage pursuant to Article 621 of the Civil Act. (2) Defendant D is an owner of the instant land as of July 23, 2015, and is obligated to implement the procedures for the registration of ownership transfer in accordance with the agreement on July 23, 2015.

Plaintiff

A (Preliminary Plaintiff B) seeks implementation of the procedure for ownership transfer registration of the passage road of this case by subrogation of Defendant C in order to preserve the right to claim the above right to claim the lease registration against Defendant C.

3) Defendant E entered into a title trust agreement with Defendant C and completed the registration of the right to claim ownership transfer on June 28, 2016. Since the above title trust agreement and the right to claim ownership transfer registration are null and void in violation of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name, Plaintiff A (the Plaintiff B), in succession, seek for the implementation of the procedure for the registration of the right to claim ownership transfer registration, by subrogation of Defendant C and Defendant D in succession.