When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 25, 2016, the Defendant continued to walk the above vehicle at the crosswalk 116, 23:30, the Jambae-ro 116, the Jambae-ro, Gamba-ro, Gamba-ro, Gamba-ro, Gamba-ro, Gamba-ro, Gamba-ro, Lamba-ro, Lba-ro, Lba-ro, Lba-ro, Lba-ro, Lba-ro, Lba-ro, Lba-ro, Lba-ro, Lba-ro, Lba-ro, Lba-ro, Lba-ro, Lba-ro, Lba-ro, Lba-ro, the Defendant, at the above crosswalk, on the ground that the Defendant did not stop the above crosswalk pursuant to pedestrian signals and entered the crosswalk.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Written estimate of general repair expenses;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographic data;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order shall be determined as set forth in the text, taking into consideration all the factors such as the circumstances before and after the occurrence of the instant case, age, sexual conduct, environment, etc.