The Defendant is a person who worked from the end of March 2014 to February 22, 2017 from the “G Mart” operated by the victim E with the wife population E.

On February 19, 2017, at around 21:54, the Defendant purchased goods from customers whose name is not known in the above G Mart and paid KRW 24,280 as the price, and received it to the safe. On the other hand, the Defendant: (a) made a large computer’s “collection” pressing for the purpose of theft of the said cash into the atmosphere; (b) deleted the details of cash withholding recorded in the computer; and (c) deleted the details of cash withholding recorded in the computer; and (d) deducted KRW 24,280, a cash owned by the victim.

In addition, from October 15, 2015 to February 19, 2017, a total of KRW 9,059,03,867 was stolen on a total of 5,059 occasions, as shown in the annexed crime list, as in the foregoing manner, from around October 15, 2015 to around February 19, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Details of the whole cancellation of the license test, and details of transactions;

1. Application of investigation reports (Analysis ofCCTV video recording data and accompanying photographs), investigation reports (verification of transaction details recognized by the person under consideration out of the whole cancellation details after withholding), investigation reports (Attachment of the whole cancellation details of the source equipment indicated by the person under consideration), investigation reports (Attachment of the details of the deposit transaction under the name of the suspect), investigation reports (Submission or investigation of the details of the deposit transaction under the name of the suspect), investigation reports (Analysis or investigation of transaction details of the account under the name of the suspect), investigation reports (investigation of the amount

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes, committed a theft of money that 100 million won was raised over several occasions during a period of one year and four months by manipulating the system (the Defendant that the amount of the theft specified in the crime exceeds the amount actually stolen by himself/herself).

However, considering the amount deposited in the passbook of the defendant for the same period, it is very important to consider.