2. The judgment of the defendant is a favorable condition to the defendant for the following reasons: (a) the defendant confessions all of the crimes of this case and reflects against the defendant; and (b) the sum of the amount obtained by

However, the crime of this case was committed on July 12, 201, where the defendant had no intent or ability to pay, and was provided with alcoholic beverages, alcohol, and helper services at the main store, restaurant, etc., and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the crime in light of the background and method of the crime, etc., and the victim did not reach an agreement on the repayment of damage and the method of the crime. The defendant was punished by a majority of the crimes of the same kind under the same law as this case, and it was only from July 8, 2014 when the execution of the final sentence was completed. As such, the defendant committed the crime of this case on July 12, 2014, and committed another crime of this case on the following day after being arrested and detained as an flagrant offender, and committed another crime of this case. In full view of the motive for the crime of this case, the defendant's character and behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., the defendant's argument is unreasonable, and thus, the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.