According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the electricity fee of KRW 35,379,270 and damages for delay.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. The main point of the claim is that the Defendant himself is not a party to the contract on the supply of electricity, and it is reasonable to claim the electric utility fee to B, a real counterparty, and the Defendant cannot be readily concluded that the Defendant is the party to the contract on the supply of electricity only with the Han River’s own computerized management ledger, even if

B. According to the judgment of this court, Gap evidence No. 1 (Consumer's General Inquiry) stated not only the defendant's name but also the defendant's resident registration number in the customer item column. In light of the fact that the plaintiff's arbitrary search and collection of the defendant's resident registration number and it is practically difficult to store it in the plaintiff's database, this is a reasonable ground to view that the defendant's resident registration number stated in the defendant's application for electric use, etc. under the name of the defendant was input in the

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. According to the conclusion, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from June 25, 2014 to the day of full payment, as the date of payment of the electricity charge of KRW 35,379,270 and the charges after the date of payment, as sought by the Plaintiff, as well as at the rate of 35,379,270 per annum from June 25, 2014 to the day of full payment. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim