beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.19 2018나26948

소유권말소등기

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The ground for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument by the court of first instance, and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court of first instance is the evidence submitted to this court, and the fact-finding and decision by the court of first instance are justified even if the result of the fact-finding inquiry by the court of first instance and the fact-finding inquiry conducted by the

Therefore, the court's explanation of this case is as follows: ① (1) in the judgment of the court of first instance, “each land” in the part 2, 19 in the part 2, 2, 20, 3, 1, 3, 3, 4, 5, 4, 6, 6, 10, 4, 6, 5, 5, 7, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 9, 5, 6, 10, 5, 5, 5, 6, 10, 5, 6, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 10, 6, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 10, 5, 5, 6, 4, 6, 10, 6, 6, 4, 6, 6, 3, 4,” of each land of this case.

2. If so, all of the plaintiff's claims of this case are dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.