However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On November 5, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 700,000 to a fine of KRW 1,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court’s net support on November 5, 2007, a fine of KRW 2 million as the same crime in the same court on March 11, 2013, and a fine of KRW 5 million as the same crime in the same court on December 12, 2013.

Nevertheless, on November 11, 2014, at around 21:15, the Defendant driven a car C Launa without a driver’s license, under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 100 meters from the front of the Dolin Jeju-do Municipal Ordinance, which is located in the Dolin-do Municipal Ordinance, to the front of the floor of the Dolin-si, the Seocheon-si, the Seocheon-si, the Seocheon-si, the Seocheon-si, the Dol-si.

As a result, the Defendant had driven a motor vehicle without a driver's license while under the influence of alcohol more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Report on the situation of running a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol;

1. Inquiry into the result of the crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records, etc. and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act ( considered as favorable circumstances among the reasons for the punishment in prison);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( repeatedly considering the same conditions as the above);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant committed the crime of this case even though he had a record of punishment for the same kind of drinking driving on several occasions, and the nature of the crime is heavy.

However, the execution of imprisonment shall be suspended only once in consideration of the fact that the defendant reflects the crime of this case and again is expected not to drive under the influence of alcohol.