If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant is the business owner who runs sexual traffic establishments with the trade name "D" in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building C between February 2, 2019 and March 18, 2019.

The Defendant advertised the said commercial sex acts on the advertising site, such as “E,” and, on March 18, 2019, caused the said commercial sex acts, etc. to have sexual intercourse with the said women, etc. by receiving KRW 1.60,00 won per hour from the EF (the age of 32) who was found in the said commercial sex acts and received KRW 37,00,000 from the sex purchase business place, which was found in the said commercial sex acts. In addition, the Defendant had the said women, etc. do sexual intercourse with the said women during the period from February 2, 2019 to March 18, 2019.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against the F, G, or the accused;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Report on internal investigation (related to the communications between the business owner and the women of sexual traffic);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Articles 19 (2) 1 and 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Additional collection under Article 48 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to a provisional payment order, the Defendant performed a space, time zone, and procurement of sexual traffic women in a very systematic manner.

In principle, punishment is inevitable.

However, in consideration of the fact that the defendant is a primary offender, is still young and has a high possibility to start a new life in another way, the defendant seems to repent of his behavior, and the character, conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant is considered.