However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 13, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months with prison labor for the crime of evading compulsory execution from the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch on February 13, 2020, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 21, 2020.

The Defendant entered into a lease monthly lease agreement with the lessor D (agent E) referred to in the Dongwon-gu, Ansan-si and the Defendant, from February 23, 2016 to February 23, 2018, to pay KRW 1 million per month for 24 months from February 23, 2018, and decided to reside in the above place until February 23, 2018 in accordance with normal contract procedures.

However, since October 2017, the Defendant failed to pay monthly rent for three months from the end of December, 2017, and in the event that rent such as monthly rent is delayed for three months or more and forced to leave the place of residence, the Defendant was aware that the State would pay the emergency welfare subsidy (hereinafter referred to as “unlimited care project cost”) in accordance with the Emergency Welfare Support Act.

From the end of December 2017, the Defendant: (a) visited the Dong-dong Administrative Welfare Center of Dong-gu, Ansan-si to receive notice of the documents necessary for the payment of the free care project cost from the public official F; and (b) received confirmation of fact from E, an agent of the lessor of the apartment in the Dong-gu, Ansan-si; (c) in the name column of the confirmation document; (d) in the address of the Gyeonggi-do, the Defendant entered the “A” in the name column of the confirmation document; and (e) in the address of the Dong-gu, Ansan-si; and (e) in the column of the reason for eviction, the Defendant entered the “A” in the column of the reason for eviction, “3,000,000” and entered the “E” as “E” and entered the “E.G” as “E.” and forged the document for the purpose of exercising the confirmation document to the public official in charge of E, who is the lessor, as if he were the lessor.

B. The Defendant is holding a superior investigative document.