의료법위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
No person shall establish a massage treatment establishment without obtaining the recognition of qualification as a massage operator.
From September 21, 2011, the Defendant: (a) around 39, the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 39, equipped with the facility, such as bed, which is about 45 square meters in size; and (b) did not obtain the recognition of Marster and massage; and (c) employed nine-qualified massages, such as E, F, and G, without obtaining the recognition of Marster’s recognition.
The Defendant, from around 15:20 on July 10, 201 to around 17:50 on July 10, 2012, had h, an unqualified mar, who found the said business place, engage in an unqualified horse for 150 minutes in the manner of growing 150 minutes to customers with bad names, such as growing trees, shoulders, light, bridges, legs, and the part of the sloping part of the sloping part in hand and arms, thereby receiving a charge of KRW 120,00 from around September 21, 201 to July 10, 201, thereby having the Defendant gain unjust enrichment of KRW 30,000,000 per month from around 30 million to July 10, 201.
As a result, the Defendant established a massage treatment facility without obtaining the recognition of the qualification of the massage operator.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of each Act or subordinate statute of the police interrogation protocol on H, E, I, J, K, L, G, F, and M;
1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and Articles 87 (1) 2, 82 (3), and 33 (2) of the Medical Service Act for the Selection of Punishment;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is against the Constitution by infringing on the essential contents of the freedom of occupation of the visually impaired.
In this case, the legal provision of this case allows the visually impaired people to enjoy the view of life and human life.
Since the purpose of this study is to realize the right to enjoy a friendly life, the legislative purpose is legitimate, and it is different.