If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. Around 00:30 on June 9, 2015, the Defendant was driving C in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of 0.133% in blood on the front of the 1196 subordinate Haak apartment, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, while under the influence of alcohol content at around 00:13%.

2. On August 2015, the Defendant also got a police investigation due to driving under the influence of alcohol as stated in the above 1. Aviationman on the first day of August 2015, the Defendant was in the same drinking place to conceal the police investigation.

D Driving a car on the road above by telephone;

The statement is different, and D had D feel a false statement.

The Defendant, at the Seoul Nowon-gu Police Station located in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, on August 27, 2015, caused D to stop on the safety zone by driving the said body car at the E Racing Station affiliated with the above police station, which is investigating the above drinking driving case.

In order to make a false statement, the criminal has instigated the criminal to avoid.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the circumstances of drivers employed at home;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2, Article 44 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking and the choice of fines), Articles 151 (1) and 31 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the occupation of an offender and the choice of fines) and Article 148-2 (2) 2, and 44 of the same Act concerning the selective punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment does not lead to a great obstacle to the investigation by the defendant committed the crime at the investigation stage of the prosecution, and there is no record that the defendant has been punished for driving under drinking after 2009, the defendant's mistake is divided in depth, and the defendant's motive leading to driving under drinking is considered, and the distance seems to be only 70 meters, and the defendant's age and environment appears to be merely 70 meters, taking into account the sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age and environment