When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. The Defendant: (a) around 21:30 on May 28, 2013, the damage and damage of property: (b) was found in front of the Dacco car driven by the victim D while walking together with his/her husband and wife; (c) reported that the ecoo car driven by the victim D goes beyond the central line, and caused the ecoo car to go out of the central line; and (d) determined that the victim of the defect in the signal called Ga opened a window for the car and the Defendant “influence of Dou,” and caused the victim to break out the car as it is, while making it difficult for him/her to walk out the car, thereby damaging the repair cost by getting off the part between the main and the left fluor, so that the 1,009,708 won of the repair cost would be destroyed.

2. The Defendant committed assault with the victim D and trial expenses at the time and place mentioned in the above Paragraph 1. At the same time and place, and assaulted with the victim’s breath by spathing and salkeing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against D or accused;

1. Each photograph;

1. The CD data;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence and the selection of fines) that apply to the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the defendant's claim of the provisional payment order asserts that although the defendant has set a D's car at a rain, it did not cause damage to the D's car.

The following circumstances, which can be recognized by the above evidence, are, namely, CCTV screen, in which the situation at the time of the instant case was taken by the Defendant in a way that the Defendant left the part between the main entrance of the car and the left aft, are taken by a rain. The photograph taken immediately immediately after the instant case is taken by a picture of the part between the main entrance of the car and the left aft, etc., and the seal of the Defendant is being taken.