채무부존재확인
1. It is confirmed that the Plaintiff’s obligation to the Defendant due to an accident stated in the attached Form does not exist;
2...
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a person who operates a restaurant with the trade name “D” in the south-gu, Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu.
나. 피고는 2019. 8. 31. 19:00경 가족들과 함께 위 음식점을 방문하여 뼈해장국을 주문하였고, 원고로부터 위 음식을 제공받아 취식하던 중 뼛조각을 모르고 삼켜 뼛조각이 식도로 넘어가는 바람에 별지 기재와 같은 사고(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라 한다)를 당하였다.
C. On August 31, 2019, the Defendant was diagnosed on August 21, 2019, by using the booms and pains of the instant accident, to undergo an inspection at an emergency room of the E Hospital, and the Defendant was diagnosed as having a disease suspected of being a foreign substance in X-ray, even though it does not seem to have any foreign substance in the future.
피고는 2019. 9. 1. 위 병원 소화기내과에 입원한 후 내시경을 통하여 식도 상부에서 2.5cm 크기의 넓은 뼛조각을 제거하는 시술을 받고 2019. 9. 2. 목부위 통증 등이 호전되어 퇴원하였다.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 to 5, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident occurred due to the Defendant’s negligence, and the Plaintiff demanded compensation against the Plaintiff, even though there was no negligence on the part of the Plaintiff regarding the said accident, thereby seeking confirmation that there was no liability against the Defendant due to the instant accident.
나. 피고의 주장 원고가 이 사건 사고 이후 뼛조각을 제대로 거르지 못한 것 같다며 과실을 인정하고 보험에 접수하여 주었고, 이 사건 사고로 피고는 치료비 650,000원, 1개월 간 영업손실액 5,981,000원, 항공료 손해 1,748,027원, 위자료 3,000,000원 합계 11,289,027원의 손해를 입었으므로, 원고의 청구는 이유 없다.
3. Determination
A. In a lawsuit seeking confirmation of existence of money, the fact that the Plaintiff, a debtor, specified the claim first and caused the occurrence of the obligation.