Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Cleviacos.

On July 15, 2009, at around 22:30, the defendant, at around 22:30, operated a two-way intersection in front of the 34 Da-ro, Seongbuk-gu Seoul Bolllla, in the direction of a pair of digging bridges from the side of the Seongbuk-gu Police Station, and the left turn to the stop signal, the defendant conflict with the E-to-land operated by the victim D (the age of 21) from the right side of the defendant's running direction to the left by the straight signal

As a result, the defendant suffered injury, such as the left-hand chest wall that requires treatment for about two weeks, by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to traffic accident-related documents (a written resolution for the payment of medical expenses, written resolution for the payment of agreed amount, written request for the termination of the large number of pages, and an accident investigation report);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Part not guilty of the order of provisional payment under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the point of violation of the Road Traffic Act without a license);

1. On July 15, 2009, at around 22:30 on July 15, 2009, the Defendant driven a Craba vehicle in the direction of a pair of bridges in the direction of a two-way intersection of the intersection of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Bollaro, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, the suspension period of driver’s license (from June 13, 2009 to July 22, 2009).

2. The Defendant asserts that there was no intention for driving without a license since he did not receive a notice of suspension of driver's license specified by the Commissioner General of the National Police Agency, and thus, the Defendant did not have any intention to drive without a license.

3. The list of driver's licenses, inquiries about administrative dispositions by the main office, and details of administrative dispositions for driver's licenses, which correspond to the facts charged in this part of the judgment, are as follows: ① The head of Seongbuk-gu Police Station on November 23, 2008 on the defendant's pathology within the Seongbuk-gu Police Station.