beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.04.17 2014고합775

특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On Nov. 1, 2008, the Defendant forged public documents, and forged private documents, contained respectively a certified copy of the register, land cadastre, land utilization plan confirmation, individual land price confirmation, and an appraisal report related to real estate development projects in the Busan Metropolitan City, which was issued in advance at the PC located in the Busan, Jin-dong located in Busan, Busan, Busan, and affixed the number of each of the above documents to “Seoul, Busan, EF,” and the owner or client to “F,” respectively, and affixed the F seal in the form of loan consultation and application form, credit transaction seal impression report form, loan transaction agreement form, each applicant, reporter, or his own name to “F,” and affixed the F seal which had been sold later.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of the register in the name of the officer in charge of computerized management of the Office of Court Administration, a copy of the register in the name of the head of the Maritime Affairs Office, a copy of the land cadastre in the name of the head of the Maritime Affairs Office, a certificate of land use planning in the name of the head of the Maritime Affairs Office, a certificate of the above head of the Maritime Affairs Office, a letter of appraisal in the name of appraiser G, a letter of credit transaction in the name of the F, a letter of credit transaction in the name of the F, and a letter of loan transaction in the name of the F, and a letter of the F.

2. On November 20, 2008, the Defendant: (a) submitted forged documents, such as Paragraph (1), to H, a staff member of the above credit cooperative, who was aware of the forgery, at the forest-dong community credit cooperative located in the Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Busan; and (b) submitted them as if they were genuine.

3. The Defendant was duly delegated by F with regard to the application for a loan, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, by the said method.