If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the Moel C parking lot located in Ansan-gu, 05:27, the Defendant reported on December 12, 2017, that “A person who goes on and goes on the drinking telecom,” and that “a person who goes on and goes on the drinking telecom,” was defective in the E police box belonging to the police station DNA box during the period of his/her dispatch, and that F, to verify the Defendant’s identity; (b) the Defendant himself/herself “I Y, Chewing ma, pene

6 60

“Sicked fish with hand, sporesed fish, and sporesed into the hand floor of E once.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs, etc. (No. 2 No. 5 of the evidence list), CCTV closure photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not correspond to the nature of a crime in light of the background and content of the crime, the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the crime committed by an drunk and contingent crime is considered as a crime. However, the Defendant’s mistake is seriously reflected, and various sentencing conditions, such as the primary offender, the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, occupation, and family relation, should be taken into account.